Masters Of War

Come you masters of war You that build all the guns You that build the death planes You that build all the bombs You that hide behind walls You that hide behind desks I just want you to know I can see through your masks. You that never done nothin' But build to destroy You play with my world Like it's your little toy You put a gun in my hand And you hide from my eyes And you turn and run farther When the fast bullets fly. Like Judas of old You lie and deceive A world war can be won You want me to believe But I see through your eyes And I see through your brain Like I see through the water That runs down my drain. You fasten all the triggers For the others to fire Then you set back and watch When the death count gets higher You hide in your mansion' As young people's blood Flows out of their bodies And is buried in the mud. You've thrown the worst fear That can ever be hurled Fear to bring children Into the world For threatening my baby Unborn and unnamed You ain't worth the blood That runs in your veins. How much do I know To talk out of turn You might say that I'm young You might say I'm unlearned But there's one thing I know Though I'm younger than you That even Jesus would never Forgive what you do. Let me ask you one question Is your money that good Will it buy you forgiveness Do you think that it could I think you will find When your death takes its toll All the money you made Will never buy back your soul. And I hope that you die And your death'll come soon I will follow your casket In the pale afternoon And I'll watch while you're lowered Down to your deathbed And I'll stand over your grave 'Til I'm sure that you're dead.------- Bob Dylan 1963

Tuesday, March 28, 2023

biggest drop in gasoline supplies in 18 months; DUC well backlog at 4.9 months

US oil prices rose last week as oil traders refocused on supply and demand fundamentals after the prior week's panic sell-off…after falling 13% to a 15 month low of $66.74 a barrel last week in the wake of the second and third biggest bank failures in US history, the contract price for the benchmark US light sweet crude for April delivery fell over $3 in Asian trading on Monday, on fears that turmoil in the global banking sector would spark a recession that would sap fuel demand, and traded off 1% in early New York trading as a deal in which UBS, Switzerland’s largest bank, agreed to buy Credit Suisse in an attempt to rescue the country’s second biggest bank, failed to ease banking concerns, but rallied late in the session to settle the session 90 cents higher at $67.64 a barrel, supported by a sharp retreat in the U.S. dollar as traders positioned ahead of the two-day Fed policy meeting, when officials were expected to deliver another round of interest rate increases amid still high inflation....oil prices headed higher at the open on the last day of trading for April oil on Tuesday, with increasing demand and disruptions in supply pushing prices higher, then advanced more than 1.5% after Russia announced it would extend its unilateral 500,000 bpd production cut, and finished trading $1.69 or 2.5% higher at $69.33 a barrel, while the more actively traded contract for US oil for May delivery settled $1.85 higher at $69.67 a barrel, as measures to stabilize the banking sector and pledges from major central banks to boost liquidity calmed the fears about the financial system that had been roiling markets...now quoting the price of the May oil contract, oil prices rallied early Wednesday after the EIA reported huge drawdowns of fuel products, and continued on their upward trend despite an unexpected build in crude stocks as the dollar fell to a six-week low ahead of the Fed’s decision on interest rates in the afternoon, and settled $1.23 higher at $70.90 a barrel as the U.S. dollar declined sharply after Fed raised the federal funds rate 25 basis points while acknowledging turmoil in the banking sector could slow the already fragile economy...oil prices started rising for a 4th day on Thursday after Goldman Sachs analysts said they expected higher oil prices 12 months from now, pointing to a forecast demand increase in China to more than 16 million barrels daily over the period, but sold off sharply ahead of the close after U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm said that refilling the country’s SPR would be difficult this year and might take several years, and settled 94 cents lower at $69.96 a barrel as fading confidence in the financial system reignited fears that another crisis might be looming...oil prices then plunged by 4% early on Friday as the U.S. dollar rallied and banking stocks in Europe crashed in a sign of renewed pressure on the sector, but recovered to trade modestly higher by midday on the expectation of returning Chinese demand and amid a growing consensus that fears of a banking crisis were overblown, before turning lower again and settling with a 70 cent loss on the day at $69.26 a barrel, paring its weekly gains as fresh signs of stress in the banking sector caused investors to move away from riskier assets ahead of the weekend....oil prices still ended 3.8% higher on the week, while the contract for US oil for May delivery, which ended last week at $66.93 a barrel, finished 3.5% higher...

natural gas prices, on the other hand, finished lower as expectations of coming spring weather more than offset slightly cooler near term forecasts...after falling 3.8% to $2.338 per mmBTU in the widespread market rout following the failed bank takeovers last week, the contract price of US natural gas for April delivery opened higher but quickly traded lower on Monday​ morning,​ on expectations that weather driven demand would weaken by the end of the month, and tumbled 11.5 cents or 5% to settle at $2.223 per mmBTU as intensifying stress in the global financial system overwhelmed the bulls seizing upon favorable near-term weather, steady export demand and expectations ​of a seasonally robust inventory withdrawal...but Monday's action was reversed on Tuesday, as natural gas prices opened lower but quickly moved higher as bulls jumped in on the news of gas production cuts and gas settled with a 12.5 ​cent ​gain at $2.348 per mmBTU on short covering after prices hit their lowest in a month...but natural gas prices fell from the open on Wednesday on rising output and declining demand and settled 17.7 cents lower at $2.171 per mmBTU, succumbing to spring weather expectations and stout production levels...natural gas prices crept higher early Thursday and rose to an intraday high of $2.261 soon after Thursday's storage report, which was in line with industry expectations, but faded thereafter to settle 1.7 cents lower at $2.154 per mmBTU on afternoon forecasts for less cold weather and lower heating demand over the next two weeks than ​was ​previously expected...natural gas prices then ​traded  ​up on Friday, boosted by colder forecasts and expectations for back-to-back bullish storage draws relative to historic norms, and settled 6.2 cents higher at $2.226 per mmBTU, but still finshed 5.2% lower for the week...

The EIA's natural gas storage report for the week ending March 17th indicated that the amount of working natural gas held in underground storage in the US fell by 72 billion cubic feet to 1,900 billion cubic feet by the end of the week, which left our natural gas supplies 504 billion cubic feet, or 36.1% above the 1,396 billion cubic feet that were in storage on March 17th of last year, and 351 billion cubic feet, or 22.7% more than the five-year average of 1,549 billion cubic feet of natural gas that were in storage as of the 17th of March over the most recent five years….the 72 billion cubic foot withdrawal from US natural gas working storage for the cited week was a bit less than was expected by analysts surveyed by Reuters, whose average forecast called for a 75 billion cubic feet withdrawal, but it was more than the 55 billion cubic feet that were pulled out of natural gas storage during the corresponding week of 2022, and also much more than the average 45 billion cubic feet of natural gas that have typically been withdrawn from our natural gas storage during the same late winter week over the past 5 years…

The Latest US Oil Supply and Disposition Data from the EIA

US oil data from the US Energy Information Administration for the week ending March 17th showed that the key oil supply and demand metrics were little changed from the prior week, and hence we again had surplus oil to add to our stored commercial crude supplies for the 12th time in 13 weeks, and for the 19th time in the past 29 weeks, ​on the continued support of 2 million barrels per day of ​new ​oil supplies that the EIA could not account for... Our imports of crude oil fell by an average of 45,000 barrels per day to average 6,172,000 barrels per day, after falling by an average of 55,000 barrels per day during the prior week, while our exports of crude oil fell by 95,000 barrels per day to 4,932,000 barrels per day, which combined meant that the net of our trade in oil worked out to a net import average of 1,240,000 barrels of oil per day during the week ending March 17th, 50,000 more barrels per day than the net of our imports minus our exports during the prior week. Over the same period, production of crude from US wells was reportedly 100,000 barrels per day higher at 12,300,000 barrels per day, and hence our daily supply of oil from the net of our international trade in oil and from domestic well production appears to have averaged a total of 13,540,000 barrels per day during the March 17th reporting week…

Meanwhile, US oil refineries reported they were processing an average of 15,376,000 barrels of crude per day during the week ending March 17th, an average of 21,000 fewer barrels per day than the amount of oil that our refineries processed during the prior week, while over the same period the EIA’s surveys indicated that an average of 160,000 barrels of oil per day were being added to  the supplies of oil stored in the US. So, based on that reported & estimated data, the crude oil figures provided by the EIA for the week ending March 17th appear to indicate that our total working supply of oil from net imports and from oilfield production was 1,996,000 barrels per day less than what was added to storage plus our oil refineries reported they used during the week. To account for that disparity between the apparent supply of oil and the apparent disposition of it, the EIA just inserted a [+1,996,000] barrel per day figure onto line 13 of the weekly U.S. Petroleum Balance Sheet in order to make the reported data for the daily supply of oil and for the consumption of it balance out, a fudge factor that they label in their footnotes as “unaccounted for crude oil”, thus suggesting there was an omission or error of that magnitude in this week’s oil supply & demand figures that we have just transcribed.....  However, with most everyone treating these weekly EIA reports as precise, and since these weekly figures often drive oil pricing, and hence decisions to drill or complete oil wells, we’ll continue to report this data just as it's published, and just as it's watched & believed to be reasonably accurate by most everyone in the industry...(for more on how this weekly oil data is gathered, and the possible reasons for that “unaccounted for” oil, see this EIA explainer)….(NB: there is also a more recent twitter thread from an EIA administrator addressing these errors, and what they hope to do about it)

Further details from the weekly Petroleum Status Report (pdf) indicate that the 4 week average of our oil imports fell to an average of 6,217,000 barrels per day last week, which was 0.4% less than the 6,242,000 barrel per day average that we were importing over the same four-week period last year. This week's 160,000 barrel per day increase in our overall crude oil inventories was all added to our commercially available stocks of crude oil, while the amount of oil in our Strategic Petroleum Reserve remained unchanged.. This week’s crude oil production was reported to be 100,000 barrels per day higher at 12,300,000 barrels per day because the EIA's rounded estimate of the output from wells in the lower 48 states was 100,000 barrels per day higher at 11,900,000 barrels per day, while Alaska’s oil production was 3,000 barrels per day lower at 441,000 barrels per day and added 400,000 barrels per day to the the rounded national total, same as Alaska added last week....US crude oil production had reached a pre-pandemic high of 13,100,000 barrels per day during the week ending March 13th 2020, so this week’s reported oil production figure was still 6.1% below that of our pre-pandemic production peak, but was 26.8% above the pandemic low of 9,700,000 barrels per day that US oil production had fallen to during the third week of February of 2021.

US oil refineries were operating at 88.6% of their capacity while using those 15,376,000 barrels of crude per day during the week ending March 17th up from their 88.2% utilization rate during the prior week, as US refineries are now ramping up after completing their seasonal maintenance... The 15,376,000 barrels per day of oil that were refined this week were still 3.2% less than the 15,878,000 barrels of crude that were being processed daily during week ending March 18th of 2022, and 5.1% less than the 16,198,000 barrels that were being refined during the prepandemic week ending March 15th, 2019, when our refinery utilization was 88.9%, also close to normal for mid March ...

With last week's big increase in the amount of oil being refined, the gasoline output from our refineries was finally higher, increasing by 392,000 barrels per day to 9,503,000 barrels per day during the week ending March 17th, after our gasoline output had decreased by 446,000 barrels per day during the prior week. This week’s gasoline production was still 3.1% less than the 9,804,000 barrels of gasoline that were being produced daily over the same week of last year, and 4.3% less than the gasoline production of 9,925,000 barrels per day during the prepandemic week ending March 15th, 2019.   Meanwhile, our refineries’ production of distillate fuels (diesel fuel and heat oil) increased by 75,000 barrels per day to 4,503,000 barrels per day, after our distillates output had decreased by 97,000 barrels per day during the prior week. Even with this weeks increase, our distillates output was 9.6% less than the 4,979,000 barrels of distillates that were being produced daily during the week ending March 18th of 2022, and 8.5% less than the 4,923,000 barrels of distillates that were being produced daily during the week ending March 15th, 2019...

Even with the big increase in our gasoline production, our supplies of gasoline in storage at the end of the week fell for the fifth consecutive week and by the most since September 3rd 2021, decreasing by 6,399,000 barrels to 229,598,000 barrels during the week ending March 17th, after our gasoline inventories had decreased by 2,061,000 barrels during the prior week. Our gasoline supplies fell by more this week because the amount of gasoline supplied to US users rose by 366,000 barrels per day to 8,960,000 barrels per day, while our exports of gasoline rose by 1,000 barrels per day to 892,000 barrels per day, and while our imports of gasoline rose by 21,000 barrels per day to 471,000 barrels per day.. Following five straight gasoline inventory decreases, our gasoline supplies were 3.5% below last March 18th's gasoline inventories of 238,043,000 barrels, and about 4% below the five year average of our gasoline supplies for this time of the year…

Likewise, even with the increase in our distillates production, our supplies of distillate fuels decreased for the 7th time in 12 weeks, and by the most since October 7th, falling by 3,313,000 barrels to 119,715,000 barrels during the week ending March 17th, after our distillates supplies had decreased by 2,537,000 barrels during the prior week. Our distillates supplies decreased by more this week because the amount of distillates supplied to US markets, an indicator of our domestic demand, increased by 238,000 barrels per day to 3,974,000 barrels per day, and as our exports of distillates rose by 16,000 barrels per day to 1,225,000 barrels per day, while our imports of distillates rose by 67,000 barrels per day to 222,000 barrels per day.. Even after fifty-eight inventory withdrawals over the past ninety-six weeks, our distillate supplies at the end of the week were 3.8% above the 112,135,000 barrels of distillates that we had in storage on March 18th of 2022, but still about 9% below the five year average of our distillates inventories for this time of the year...

Finally, with nearly two million barrels per day of new oil supplies that could not be accounted for, our commercial supplies of crude oil in storage rose for the 19th time in 29 weeks and for the 30th time in the past year, increasing by 1,117,000 barrels over the week, from 480,063,000 barrels on March 10th to 481,180,000 barrels on March 17th, after our commercial crude supplies had increased by 1,550,000 barrels over the prior week. With several large oil supply increases in the weeks following the Christmas refinery freeze offs, our commercial crude oil inventories are now about 8% above the most recent five-year average of commercial oil supplies for this time of year, and also about 46% above the average of our available crude oil stocks as of the third weekend of March over the 5 years at the beginning of the past decade, with the apparent disparity between those comparisons arising because it wasn’t until early 2015 that our oil inventories first topped 400 million barrels. And even after our commercial crude oil inventories had jumped to record highs during the Covid lockdowns of the Spring of 2020, and then jumped again after February 2021's winter storm Uri froze off US Gulf Coast refining, our commercial crude supplies as of this March 17th were 16.4% more than the 413,399,000 barrels of oil we had in commercial storage on March 18th of 2022, but 4.3% less than the 502,711,000 barrels of oil that we had in storage in the wake of winter storm Uri on March 19th of 2021, while 5.7% more than the 455,360,000 barrels of oil we had in commercial storage on March 20th of 2020…

This Week's Rig Count

The number of drilling rigs active in the US increased for the second time in six weeks during the week ending March 24th, but were 4.4% below the prepandemic count, despite increasing ninety-seven times over the past 129 weeks... Baker Hughes reported that the total count of rotary rigs drilling in the US rose by 4 to 758 rigs over the past week, which was also 88 more rigs than the 670 rigs that were in use as of the March 25th report of 2022, but was 1,171 fewer rigs than the shale era high of 1,929 drilling rigs that were deployed on November 21st of 2014, a week before OPEC began to flood the global market with oil in an attempt to put US shale out of business. .

The number of rigs drilling for oil increased by 4 to 593 oil rigs during the past week, after the number of rigs targeting oil had decreased by 1 during the prior week, and there are still 62 more oil rigs active now than were running a year ago, even as they amount to just 36.9% of the shale era high of 1609 rigs that were drilling for oil on October 10th, 2014, and while they are still down 13.2% from the prepandemic oil rig count….at the same time, the number of drilling rigs targeting natural gas bearing formations was unchanged at 162 natural gas rigs, which was still up by 25 natural gas rigs from the 137 natural gas rigs that were drilling during the same week a year ago, even as they were still only 10.1% of the modern high of 1,606 rigs targeting natural gas that were deployed on September 7th, 2008….

In addition to those rigs targeting oil and natural gas, Baker Hughes continues to show that three rigs they've labeled as "miscellaneous" are still drilling this week: those include a directional rig drilling to between 5,000 and 10,000 feet on the big island of Hawaii, a directional rig drilling to between 5,000 and 10,000 feet into a formation in Lake county California that Baker Hughes doesn't track, and a directional rig drilling to between 5,000 and 10,000 feet into a formation in Pershing county Nevada, also unnamed by Baker Hughes.  While we haven't seen any details on any of those wells, in the past we've identified various "miscellaneous" rig activity as being for exploration rather than production, for carbon dioxide storage, and for utility scale geothermal projects....a year ago, there were two such "miscellaneous" rigs running...

The offshore rig count in the Gulf of Mexico was up by one to 17 rigs this week, with 16 of those rigs drilling for oil in Louisiana's offshore waters, and one drilling for oil in Texas waters….that Gulf rig count is also up by 3 from the 14 Gulf rigs running a year ago, when 13 Gulf rigs were drilling for oil offshore from Louisiana and one was deployed for oil offshore from Texas…in addition to rigs drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, there is also a directional rig drilling for oil at a depth between 10,000 and 15,000 feet, offshore from the Kenai Peninsula Borough of Alaska...hence, we now have a total of 18 rigs drilling offshore, up from the national offshore count of 14 a year ago..

In addition to rigs running offshore, there is also a water based directional rig drilling for oil at a depth greater than 15,000 feet through an inland body of water in Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana this week...a year ago, there were three rigs drilling on inland waters...

The count of active horizontal drilling rigs was unchanged at 692 horizontal rigs this week, which was still 82 more rigs than the 610 horizontal rigs that were in use in the US on March 25th of last year, even as it was just over half of the record 1,374 horizontal rigs that were drilling on November 21st of 2014.....meanwhile, the vertical rig count was up by one to 16 vertical rigs this week, while those were still down by 9 from the 25 vertical rigs that were operating during the same week a year ago…at the same time, the directional rig count was up by 3 to 50 directional rigs this week, and those were also up by 15 from the 35 directional rigs that were in use on March 25th of 2022…

The details on this week’s changes in drilling activity by state and by major shale basin are shown in our screenshot below of that part of the rig count summary pdf from Baker Hughes that gives us those changes…the first table below shows weekly and year over year rig count changes for the major oil & gas producing states, and the table below that shows the weekly and year over year rig count changes for the major US geological oil and gas basins…in both tables, the first column shows the active rig count as of March 24th, the second column shows the change in the number of working rigs between last week’s count (March 17th) and this week’s (March 24th) count, the third column shows last week’s March 17th active rig count, the 4th column shows the change between the number of rigs running on Friday and the number running on the Friday before the same weekend of a year ago, and the 5th column shows the number of rigs that were drilling at the end of that reporting week a year ago, which in this week’s case was the 18th of March, 2022...

we'll start by checking the Rigs by State file at Baker Hughes for the changes in the Texas Permian...there we find that there were two rigs added in Texas Oil District 8A, which overlies the northern part of the Permian Midland, but that a rig was pulled out of Texas Oil District 7C, which includes a couple counties in the easternmost Permian Midland...since the Texas Permian rig count was thus up by one rig while the national Permian count was up by 3, we can figure that the 2 rigs added in New Mexico were set up to drill in the western Permian Delaware, in the southeast corner of that state....oddly enough, those were the only changes Texas this week, after the state saw 19 rig additions and 14 rig removals last week..

in other states, Oklahoma saw oil rig removals from the Granite Wash basin near the Texas panhandle and from the Mississippian shale along the Kansas border, while a natural gas rig was added in the Cana Woodford in the first natural gas drilling in that basin since September 2019...in Colorado, meanwhile, there was an oil rig added in the DJ Niobrara chalk of the Rockies front range, while in Louisiana, there was an oil rig added in the state's offshore waters...there were also a few changes that aren't evident in the tables above; a natural gas rig was pulled out of a basin that Baker Hughes doesn't track, while there was an oil rig added in a basin that Baker Hughes doesn't track; since there is no imbalance in the changes elsewhere, it's likely those offset each other in the same basin...

DUC well report for February

Monday of last week saw the release of the EIA's Drilling Productivity Report for March, which included the EIA's February data on drilled but uncompleted (DUC) oil and gas wells in the 7 most productive shale regions (click tab 3)....that data showed an increase in uncompleted wells nationally for the third consecutive month, following 29 consecutive decreases, as both well completions and drilling of new wells decreased in February, despite being well below the average pre-pandemic levels...for the 7 sedimentary regions covered by this report, the total count of DUC wells increased by 21 wells, rising from a revised 4,752 DUC wells in December to 4,773 DUC wells in February, which was still 6.5% fewer DUCs than the 5,105 wells that had been drilled but remained uncompleted as of the end of February of a year ago...this month's DUC increase occurred as 992 wells were drilled in the 7 regions that this report covers (representing 87% of all U.S. onshore drilling operations) during February, down by 15 from the 1,007 wells that were drilled in January, while 971 wells were completed and brought into production by fracking them, down by 1 from the 972 well completions seen in January, but up by 195 from the 776 completions seen in February of last year....at the February completion rate, the 4,773 drilled but uncompleted wells remaining at the end of the month represents a 4.9 month backlog of wells that have been drilled but are not yet fracked, statistically unchanged from the DUC well backlog of a month ago, but up from the 7 1/2 year low of 4.4 months of four months ago, despite a completion rate that is now about 15% below 2019's pre-pandemic average...

Both oil basin DUCS and natural gas basin DUCs rose during February, and only  one basin saw DUCs decrease....the number of uncompleted wells in the Niobrara chalk of the Rockies' front range increased by 10, rising from 641 at the end of January to 651 DUC wells at the end of February, as 115 wells were drilled into the Niobrara chalk during February, while 105 Niobrara wells were completed....at the same time, the number of uncompleted wells remaining in Oklahoma's Anadarko basin increased by 4, rising from 732 at the end of January to 736 DUC wells at the end of February, as 75 wells were drilled into the Anadarko basin during February, while 71 Anadarko wells were completed.... meanwhile, DUC wells in the Permian basin of west Texas and New Mexico increased by 2, from 1,042 DUC wells at the end of January to 1,044 DUCs at the end of February, as 435 new wells were drilled into the Permian basin during February, while 433 already drilled wells in the region were being fracked...in addition, DUC wells in the Bakken of North Dakota were up by 1 to 580 by the end of February, as 80 wells were drilled into the Bakken during February, while 79 of the drilled wells in the Bakken were being fracked.....on the other hand, DUCs in the Eagle Ford shale of south Texas decreased by 8, from 434, DUC wells at the end of January to 426 DUCs at the end of February, as 114 wells were drilled in the Eagle Ford during February, while 122 of the already drilled Eagle Ford wells were fracked...

among the natural gas producing regions, the drilled but uncompleted well count in the Appalachian region, which includes the Utica shale, increased by one well, from 662 DUCs at the end of January to 663 DUCs at the end of February, as 98 new wells were drilled into the Marcellus and Utica shales during the month, while 97 of the already drilled wells in the region were fracked....at the same time, the uncompleted well inventory in the natural gas producing Haynesville shale of the northern Louisiana-Texas border region rose by 11, from 662 DUCs in January to 673 DUCs by the end of February, as 75 wells were drilled into the Haynesville during February, while just 64 of the already drilled Haynesville wells were fracked during the same period....thus, for the month of February, DUCs in the five major oil-producing basins tracked by this report (ie., the Anadarko, Bakken, Niobrara, Permian, and Eagle Ford) increased by nine to 3,437 DUC wells, while the uncompleted well count in the major natural gas basins (the Marcellus, the Utica, and the Haynesville) was up by twelve to 1,336 DUC wells, although as this report notes, once into production, more than half the wells drilled nationally will produce both oil and gas...

++

++

++

Note:  there’s more here..

Sunday, March 19, 2023

oil prices at 15 month low after biggest weekly drop since April 2020; oil rigs at 9 month low; global oil surplus at 620,000 bpd

oil prices fell to a 15 month low on the biggest weekly drop since the pandemic hit; oil drilling at 9 month low; global oil production exceeded demand by 620,000 barrels per day in February, despite OPEC production that was 927,000 barrels per day below their reduced quota

US oil prices fell to a 15 month low this week in the wake of the second and third biggest bank failures in US history...after falling 3.8% to $76.68 a barrel last week as traders repriced the likelihood of a demand crushing recession following hawkish comments from Fed Chairman Powell, the contract price for the benchmark US light sweet crude for April delivery fell as much as $4 in early trading on Monday as the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank roiled markets and raised fears of a new financial crisis, but came off the lows to move higher as a recovery in Chinese demand provided support for prices, but still settled $1.88 lower on the day at $74.80 a barrel as emergency measures taken by the Fed, the FDIC, and the Treasury Department to shore up confidence in the banking sector had just a limited effect in countering a selloff in the shares of regional lenders....oil prices fell more than $2 a barrel in Asian trading on Tuesday, extending the previous day's slide, alongside a continued slide in rattled equities markets, and continued on its downward path in New York trading on concerns of a broader recession that could reduce demand following the release of the Consumer Price Index report, and settled $3.47 lower at a three month low of $71.33 a barrel on a stronger U.S. dollar tied to expectations for another rate hike from the Fed next week, and persistent concerns over fuel consumption in the US along with uncertainty about a rebound in Chinese demand....Oil prices rebounded in Asian trading on Wednesday on an improving fuel demand outlook in China after OPEC raised its forecast for Chinese oil demand growth in 2023, but dropped more than 1% in early New York trading after the International Energy Agency forecast that the global oil market is likely to remain in surplus for the first half of this year, with oil inventories held in OECD countries climbing to 18-month highs on the back of strong Russian crude oil exports, and then tumbled to settle $3.72 or more than 5% lower at $67.61 a barrel, the lowest settlement since December 2021, as financial firms trying to limit their exposure to falling prices in the options market began dumping crude futures in a strategy known as delta hedging....oil prices moved up in Asian trade early Thursday, after markets received the welcome news that Swiss regulators had pledged to assist the beleaguered megabank, Credit Suisse, then climbed 1% in choppy US trading as Saudi-Russian assurances on production cuts and remarks that the U.S. banking system was ‘safe and sound’ amid the rescue of another lender helped restore some confidence, and settled 74 cents higher at $68.45 a barrel even as the European Central Bank lifted its benchmark lending rate by 50 basis points, defying expectations of a pause in rate hikes amid the banking turmoil, in a move that boosted the Euro against the U.S. dollar and hence boosted prices of commodities trading in dollars...oil prices recovered some more ground early Friday following support measures from the European Central Bank and U.S. lenders, but then turned lower after the bailed out Silicon Valley Bank filed for bankruptcy, and slid 3% to settle $1.61 lower at $66.74 a barrel on the session, the lowest close since December 2nd 2021, dogged by the banking sector crisis and worries about a possible recession...US oil prices thus finished the week down 13.0%, their worst weekly decline since April 2020, pressured by growing concerns that the banking turmoil in the United States and the European Union would trigger a financial crisis in coming months, wiping out a large chunk of the post-pandemic gains in oil demand growth..

Meanwhile, natural gas prices also finished lower, as the collapse in oil prices and the widespread market rout spread into other commodity contracts....after falling 19.2% to $2.430 per mmBTU last week on lower demand expectations following moderating temperature forecasts, the contract price of US natural gas for April delivery opened lower along with other energy commodities on Monday, but soon reversed and moved higher to settle up 17.6 cents on the day at $2.606 per mmBTU, on forecasts for demand to rise next week as gas flowing to LNG export plants was on track to hit a record high and on longer-range weather maps that continued to favor a cool start to April....natural gas prices opened higher on Tuesday, but pulled back as the 5% drop in oil futures weighed on all energy contracts and settled 3.3 cents lower at $2.573 per mmBTU as broader market concerns about inflation and panic in the financial sector helped slow price momentum....another 5% drop in the price of oil on Wednesday took natural gas prices down with it, and they settled 13.4 cents, or 5.2% lower at $2.439 per mmBTU, as analysts expected another weak EIA reading on underground inventories the next day....but natural gas prices moved higher Thursday after the reported withdrawal of natural gas from storage was well below historical pulls, but close to market expectations and settled 7.5 cents, or 3.1% higher at $2.514 per mmBTU as lower heating demand kept gains in check...however, natural gas prices moved lower again on Friday as the intimidating storage levels for the fuel: up 36% from the year-ago level and 24% above the five-year average, offset colder forecasts and sent prices tumbling 17.6 cents or 7% to $2.338 per mmBTU, and they thus finished 3.8% lower on the week...

The EIA's natural gas storage report for the week ending March 10th indicated that the amount of working natural gas held in underground storage in the US fell by 58 billion cubic feet to 1,972 billion cubic feet by the end of the week, which left our natural gas supplies 521 billion cubic feet, or 35.9% above the 1,451 billion cubic feet that were in storage on March 10th of last year, and 378 billion cubic feet, or 23.7% more than the five-year average of 1,594 billion cubic feet of natural gas that were in storage as of the 10th of March over the most recent five years….the 58 billion cubic foot withdrawal from US natural gas working storage for the cited week was lower than was expected by analysts surveyed by Reuters, whose average forecast called for a 62 billion cubic feet withdrawal, and it was much less than the 86 billion cubic feet that were pulled out of natural gas storage during the corresponding week of 2022, and also less than the average 77 billion cubic feet of natural gas that have typically been withdrawn from our natural gas storage during the same late winter week over the past 5 years…

The Latest US Oil Supply and Disposition Data from the EIA

US oil data from the US Energy Information Administration for the week ending March 10th indicated that even after a big jump in our oil exports, we had surplus oil to add to our stored commercial crude supplies for the 11th time in 12 weeks, and for the 30th time in the past 47 weeks, largely due to a big jump in oil supplies that the EIA could not account for... Our imports of crude oil fell by an average of 55,000 barrels per day to average 6,271,000 barrels per day, after rising by an average of 63,000 barrels per day during the prior week, while our exports of crude oil rose by 1,665,000 barrels per day to 5,027,000 barrels per day, which combined meant that the net of our trade in oil worked out to a net import average of 1,189,000 barrels of oil per day during the week ending March 10th, 1,720,000 fewer barrels per day than the net of our imports minus our exports during the prior week. Over the same period, production of crude from US wells was reportedly unchanged at 12,200,000 barrels per day, and hence our daily supply of oil from the net of our international trade in oil and from domestic well production appears to have averaged a total of 13,389,000 barrels per day during the March 10th reporting week…

Meanwhile, US oil refineries reported they were processing an average of 15,398,000 barrels of crude per day during the week ending March 10th, an average of 430,000 more barrels per day than the amount of oil that our refineries processed during the prior week, while over the same period the EIA’s surveys indicated that an average of 221,000 barrels of oil per day were being added to the supplies of oil stored in the US. So, based on that reported & estimated data, the crude oil figures provided by the EIA for the week ending March 10th appear to indicate that our total working supply of oil from net imports and from oilfield production was 2,230,000 barrels per day less than what was added to storage plus our oil refineries reported they used during the week. To account for that disparity between the apparent supply of oil and the apparent disposition of it, the EIA just inserted a [+2,230,000] barrel per day figure onto line 13 of the weekly U.S. Petroleum Balance Sheet in order to make the reported data for the daily supply of oil and for the consumption of it balance out, a fudge factor that they label in their footnotes as “unaccounted for crude oil”, thus suggesting there was an omission or error of that magnitude in this week’s oil supply & demand figures that we have just transcribed..... Furthermore, since last week’s “unaccounted for crude oil” was at [-384,000] barrels per day, that means there was a 2,614,000 barrel per day difference between this week's balance sheet error and the EIA's crude oil balance sheet error from a week ago, and hence the changes to supply and demand from that week to this one that are indicated by this week's report are off by that much, thus rendering any such comparisons nonsensical.... However, since most everyone treats these weekly EIA reports as precise, and since these weekly figures often drive oil pricing, and hence decisions to drill or complete oil wells, we’ll continue to report this data just as it's published, and just as it's watched & believed to be reasonably accurate by most everyone in the industry...(for more on how this weekly oil data is gathered, and the possible reasons for that “unaccounted for” oil, see this EIA explainer)….(NB: there is also a more recent twitter thread from an EIA administrator addressing these errors, and what they hope to do about it)

Further details from the weekly Petroleum Status Report (pdf) indicate that the 4 week average of our oil imports fell to an average of 6,255,000 barrels per day last week, which was 1.1% less than the 6,327,000 barrel per day average that we were importing over the same four-week period last year. This week's 221,000 barrel per day increase in our overall crude oil inventories was all added to our commercially available stocks of crude oil, while the amount of oil in our Strategic Petroleum Reserve remained unchanged.. This week’s crude oil production was reported to be unchanged at 12,200,000 barrels per day because the EIA's rounded estimate of the output from wells in the lower 48 states was unchanged at 11,800,000 barrels per day, while Alaska’s oil production was 3,000 barrels per day higher at 440,000 barrels per day and added 400,000 barrels per day to the the rounded national total, same as Alaska added last week....US crude oil production had reached a pre-pandemic high of 13,100,000 barrels per day during the week ending March 13th 2020, so this week’s reported oil production figure was still 6.9% below that of our pre-pandemic production peak, but was 25.8% above the pandemic low of 9,700,000 barrels per day that US oil production had fallen to during the third week of February of 2021.

US oil refineries were operating at 88.2% of their capacity while using those 15,398,000 barrels of crude per day during the week ending March 3rd, up from their 86.0% utilization rate during the prior week, as US refineries are beginning to ramp up after completing their seasonal maintenance... The 15,398,000 barrels per day of oil that were refined this week were still 1.3% less than the 15,601,000 barrels of crude that were being processed daily during week ending March 11th of 2022, and 3.9% less than the 16,020,000 barrels that were being refined during the prepandemic week ending March 8th, 2019, when our refinery utilization was 87.6%, close to normal for early March ...

Even with that big increase in the amount of oil being refined this week, the gasoline output from our refineries was again lower, decreasing by 446,000 barrels per day to 9,111,000 barrels per day during the week ending March 10th, after our gasoline output had decreased by 179,000 barrels per day during the prior week. This week’s gasoline production was 2.9% less than the 9,380,000 barrels of gasoline that were being produced daily over the same week of last year, and 6.4% less than the gasoline production of 9,735,000 barrels per day during the prepandemic week ending March 8th, 2019. Meanwhile, our refineries’ production of distillate fuels (diesel fuel and heat oil) decreased by 97,000 barrels per day to 4,428,000 barrels per day, after our distillates output had decreased by 84,000 barrels per day during the prior week.  With this weeks decrease, our distillates output was 10.5% less than the 4,945,000 barrels of distillates that were being produced daily during the week ending March 11th of 2022, and 8.8% less than the 4,856,000 barrels of distillates that were  being produced daily during the week ending March 8th, 2019...

With the decrease in our gasoline production, our supplies of gasoline in storage at the end of the week fell for the sixth time in eighteen weeks and for the 16th time in 31 weeks, decreasing by 2,061,000 barrels to 235,997,000 barrels during the week ending March 10th, after our gasoline inventories had decreased by 1,134,000 barrels during the prior week. Our gasoline supplies fell by more this week as the amount of gasoline supplied to US users rose by 32,000 barrels per day to 8,594,000 barrels per day, and because our exports of gasoline rose by 60,000 barrels per day to 891,000 barrels per day, while our imports of gasoline rose by 4,000 barrels per day to 450,000 barrels per day.. Following four straight gasoline inventory decreases, our gasoline supplies were 2.1% below last March 11th's gasoline inventories of 240,991,000 barrels, and about 3% below the five year average of our gasoline supplies for this time of the year…

With the decrease in our distillates production, our supplies of distillate fuels decreased for the 6th time in 11 weeks, and for the 24th time over the past year, falling by 2,537,000 barrels to 119,715,000 barrels during the week ending March 10th, after our distillates supplies had increased by 138,000 barrels during the prior week.  Our distillates supplies decreased this week because the amount of distillates supplied to US markets, an indicator of our domestic demand, increased by 222,000 barrels per day to 3,736,000 barrels per day, and because our exports of distillates rose by 77,000 barrels per day to 1,209,000 barrels per day,  while our imports of distillates rose by 14,000 barrels per day to 155,000 barrels per day.. Even after fifty-eight inventory withdrawals over the past ninety-six weeks, our distillate supplies at the end of the week were 4.8% above the 114,206,000 barrels of distillates that we had in storage on March 4th of 2022, but still about 8% below the five year average of our distillates inventories for this time of the year...

Finally, with nearly two and a quarter million barrels per day of new oil supplies that could not be accounted for, our commercial supplies of crude oil in storage rose for the 18th time in 31 weeks and for the 25th time in the past year, increasing by 1,550,000 barrels over the week, from 478,513,000 barrels on March 3rd to 480,063,000 barrels on March 10th, after our commercial crude supplies had decreased by 1,694,000 barrels over the prior week. With several large oil supply increases in the weeks following the Christmas refinery freeze offs, our commercial crude oil inventories were about 7% above the most recent five-year average of commercial oil supplies for this time of year, and also about 45% above the average of our available crude oil stocks as of the first weekend of March over the 5 years at the beginning of the past decade, with the apparent disparity between those comparisons arising because it wasn’t until early 2015 that our oil inventories first topped 400 million barrels. And even after our commercial crude oil inventories had jumped to record highs during the Covid lockdowns of the Spring of 2020, and then jumped again after February 2021's winter storm Uri froze off US Gulf Coast refining, our commercial crude supplies as of this March 10th were 15.4% more than the 415,907,000 barrels of oil we had in commercial storage on March 11th of 2022, but 4.1% less than the 500,799,000 barrels of oil that we had in storage after winter storm Uri on March 12th of 2021, while 5.8% more than the 444,119,000 barrels of oil we had in commercial storage on March 13th of 2020…

OPEC's Report on Global Oil for February

Tuesday of this past week saw the release of OPEC's March Oil Market Report, which includes the details on OPEC's & global oil data for February, and hence it gives us a picture of the global oil supply & demand situation during a period when demand for oil was increasing ​in the 2nd month after China ​had ​reopened to foreign travelers and removed the Covid-related lockdowns on its citizens, while oil supplies from Russia were further reduced by the European Union's ban of Russian oil imports by sea, and by the G7's Russian oil price cap....February was also the fourth month that OPEC and aligned oil producers were operating under a 2 million barrel per day production cut, meant to take roughly 2% of global oil supplies off the market, in response to a perceived global surplus and related lower prices...

The first table from this month's report that we'll review is from the page numbered 50 of this month's report (pdf page 60), and it shows oil production in thousands of barrels per day for each of the current OPEC members over the recent years, quarters and months, as the column headings below indicate...for all their official production measurements, OPEC has used an average of production estimates by ​as many as eight "secondary sources", namely the International Energy Agency (IEA), the oil-pricing agencies Platts and Argus, ‎the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the oil consultancy Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA)​,​​ the industry newsletter Petroleum Intelligence Weekly, the ​energy ​consultancy Wood Mackenzie and the research and intelligence firm Rystad Energy​,​ as a means of impartially adjudicating whether their output quotas and production cuts are being met, to thereby avert any potential disputes that could arise if each member reported their own figures….

As we can see in the bottom right hand corner of the above table, OPEC's oil output increased by a rounded 117,000 barrels per day to 28,924,000 barrels per day during February, ​up from their revised January production total that averaged 28,807,000 barrels per day....however, that January output figure was originally reported as 28,876,000 barrels per day, which therefore means that OPEC's January production was revised 69,000 barrels per day lower with this report, and hence OPEC's February production was, in effect, just 48,000 barrels per day more than the previously reported OPEC production figure (for your reference, here is a copy of the table of the official December OPEC output figures as reported a month ago, before this month's revision)...

while OPEC and other aligned oil producers agreed to reduce production by 2,000,000 barrels per day beginning in November, and while the net 605,000 barrel per day they've cut since were well short of that, OPEC's production was already running 1,585,000 barrels per day below what they were expected to produce when this policy was initiated in October, so the 28,924,000 barrels per day they produced in February still leaves them short of what they were expected to produce during the month, as we'll see in the next table...

The above table was originally included as a downloadable attachment to the press release following the 33rd OPEC and non-OPEC Ministerial Meeting on October 5th, 2022, which set OPEC's and other aligned oil producers' production quotas for November and the following months through the end of 2023, and the quotas shown above were reaffirmed by the cartel for the first 6 months of 2023 in during the 34th OPEC and non-OPEC Ministerial Meeting on December 4th, 2022....the first column above, labeled "August 2022 required production", actually matches the October 2018 baseline production level on which OPEC and aligned producers have based all of their quotas since the onset of the pandemic, and the "Voluntary adjustment" is the production cut each country is expected to make from that level, leaving each with a Volunary Production level they're expected to hit during 2023, whether they've produced that much recently or not....since war torn Libya and US sanctioned producers Iran and Venezuela have been exempt from the production cuts imposed by the joint agreement that has governed the output of the other OPEC producers since May 2020, they are not shown on the above list, and OPEC's quota excluding them is aggregated under the total listed for the 'OPEC 10', which you can see was expected to be at 25,416,000 barrels per day from November 2022 through December 2023...therefore, the 24,489,000 barrels those 10 OPEC members actually produced in January were still 927,000 barrels per day short of what they were expected to produce during the month, with Nigeria, Angola and Saudi Arabia accounting for the majority of this month's ​production ​shortfall...

The next graphic from this month's report that we'll look at shows us both OPEC's and worldwide oil production monthly on the same graph, over the period from March 2021 t​hru February 2023, and it comes from page 51 (pdf page 61) of OPEC's March Oil Market Report....on this graph, the cerulean blue bars represent OPEC's monthly oil production in millions of barrels per day as shown on the left scale, while the purple graph represents global oil production in millions of barrels per day, with the metrics for global output shown on the right scale....

Including this month's 117,000 barrel per day increase in OPEC's production from their revised production of a month earlier, OPEC's preliminary estimate is that total global liquids production increased by a rounded 600,000 barrels per day to average 101.90 million barrels per day in February, a reported increase which came after January's total global output figure was apparently revised down by a rounded 400,000 barrels per day from the 101.70 million barrels per day of global oil output that was reported for January a month ago, as non-OPEC oil production rose by a rounded ​500,000 barrels per day in February after that downward revision, with most of February's production growth coming from the OECD Americas and OECD Europe, which were partially offset by production declines in Latin America and Kazakhstan.…

After that 600,000 barrel per day February increase in global output, the 101.90 million barrels of oil per day that were produced globally during the month were 2.61 million barrels per day, or 2.6% more than the revised 99.29 million barrels per day that were being produced globally in February a year ago, which was the seventh month of the series of 400 million barrel per day production increases that OPEC and their allied producers implemented as the​ir​ fourth ​output ​policy reset in response to the global demand recovery​,​ following the early pandemic lockdowns (see the March 2022 OPEC report for the originally reported February 2022 details)…with this month's increase in OPEC's ​output ​somewhat smaller than the reported global increase, their February oil production of 28,924,000 barrels per day was down by 0.1% to 28.4% of what was produced globally during the month, after their share of the global total in December was revised up ​0.1% ​from the 28.4% reported last month (​due to the large downward revision to global output)….OPEC's February 2022 production was ultimately revised to 28,500,000 barrels per day with the April 2022 OPEC report, which means that the same 13 OPEC members who were part of OPEC last year produced 843,000 barrels per day, or 1.5% more barrels per day of oil this February than what they produced last February, when they accounted for 28.8% of a smaller global output total…

With the increase in global oil output that we've seen in this report, the amount of oil being produced globally during the month was again above the expected global demand, as this next table from the OPEC report will show us...

The above table came from page 29 of the March Oil Market Report (pdf page 33), and it shows regional and total oil demand estimates in millions of barrels per day for 2022 in the first column, and then OPEC's estimate of oil demand by region and globally, quarterly over 2023 over the rest of the table…on the "Total world" line in the second column, we've highlighted in blue the figure that's relevant for February, which is their estimate of global oil demand during the first quarter of 2023….OPEC is estimating that during the 1st quarter of this year, all oil consuming regions of the globe have been using an average of 101.28 million barrels of oil per day, which is an upward revision of 20,000 barrels per day from their estimate 101.26 million barrels per day for 1st quarter demand of 2023 a month ago (the revisions to 2023 ​demand estimates ​are highlighted in green)…but as OPEC showed us in the oil supply section of this report and the summary supply graph above, OPEC and the rest of the world's oil producers were producing 101.90 million barrels per day during February, which would imply that there was surplus of around 620,000 barrels per day of global oil production in February, when compared to the demand estimated for the month...

In addition to figuring February's global oil supply surplus that's evident in this report, the downward revision of 400,000 barrels per day to January's global oil output that's implied in this report, slightly offset by the 20,000 barrels per day upward revision to first quarter demand noted above, means that the 440,000 barrels per day global oil output surplus we had previously figured for January would now be revised to a surplus of just 60,000 barrels per day for that month...

Also note that in orange we've also circled an upward revision of 30,000 barrels per day to 2022's demand, which also means that the supply surpluses and shortfalls that we previously reported over last year would have to be revised....a separate table on page 28 of the March Oil Market Report (pdf page 38) indicates the revisions to 2022 demand included an a downward revision of 70,000 barrels per day to 4th quarter demand, an upward revision of 50,000 barrels per day to 3rd quarter demand, an upward revision of 70,000 barrels per day to 2nd quarter demand, and an upward revision of 70,000 barrels per day to 1st quarter demand...we're not inclined to go back and recompute each month of 2022, but we have totals for each month of the year accompanying our review of OPEC's December report, should anyone want to review how 2022's oil supply & demand shook out..

This Week's Rig Count

The number of drilling rigs active in the US increased for the first time in five weeks during the week ending March 17th, but were 4.9% below the prepandemic count, despite increasing ninety-six times over the past 128 weeks... Baker Hughes reported that the total count of rotary rigs drilling in the US rose by 8 to 754 rigs over the past week, which was also 91 more rigs than the 663 rigs that were in use as of the March 18th report of 2022, but was 1,175 fewer rigs than the shale era high of 1,929 drilling rigs that were deployed on November 21st of 2014, a week before OPEC began to flood the global market with oil in an attempt to put US shale out of business. .

The number of rigs drilling for oil decreased by 1 to to a nine month low of 589 oil rigs during the past week, after the number of rigs targeting oil had decreased by 2 during the prior week, but there are still 65 more oil rigs active now than were running a year ago, even as they amount to just 36.6% of the shale era high of 1609 rigs that were drilling for oil on October 10th, 2014, and while they are now down 13.8% from the prepandemic oil rig count….at the same time, the number of drilling rigs targeting natural gas bearing formations increased by ​9 to 162 natural gas rigs, which was also up by 25 natural gas rigs from the 137 natural gas rigs that were drilling during the same week a year ago, even as they were still only 10.1% of the modern high of 1,606 rigs targeting natural gas that were deployed on September 7th, 2008….

In addition to those rigs targeting oil and natural gas, Baker Hughes continues to show that three rigs they've labeled as "miscellaneous" are still drilling this week: those include a directional rig drilling to between 5,000 and 10,000 feet on the big island of Hawaii, a directional rig drilling to between 5,000 and 10,000 feet into a formation in Lake county California that Baker Hughes doesn't track, and a directional rig drilling to between 5,000 and 10,000 feet into a formation in Pershing county Nevada, also unnamed by Baker Hughes….While we haven't seen any details on any of those wells, in the past we've identified various "miscellaneous" rig activity as being for exploration​ rather than production​, for carbon dioxide storage, and for utility scale geothermal projects....a year ago, there were two such "miscellaneous" rigs running...

The offshore rig count in the Gulf of Mexico was up by two to 16 rigs this week, with 15 of those rigs drilling for oil in Louisiana's offshore waters, and one drilling for oil in Texas waters….that Gulf rig count is also up by 4 from the 12 Gulf rigs running a year ago, when 11 Gulf rigs were drilling for oil offshore from Louisiana and one was deployed for oil offshore from Texas…in addition to rigs drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, this week saw the startup of a directional rig drilling for oil at a depth between 10,000 and 15,000 feet, offshore from the Kenai Peninsula Borough of Alaska, as apparently the weather has moderated enough for Alaskan offshore drilling to resume...hence, we now have a total of 17 rigs drilling offshore, up from the national offshore count of 12 a year ago..

In addition to rigs running offshore, there is also a water based directional rig drilling for oil at a depth greater than 15,000 feet through an inland body of water in Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana this week...a year ago, there were three rigs drilling on inland waters...

The count of active horizontal drilling rigs was unchanged at 692 horizontal rigs this week, which was still 86 more rigs than the 606 horizontal rigs that were in use in the US on March 18th of last year, even as it was just over half of the record 1,374 horizontal rigs that were drilling on November 21st of 2014.....meanwhile, the vertical rig count was up by three to 15 vertical rigs this week, which was still down by 6 from the 21 vertical rigs that were operating during the same week a year ago…at the same time, the directional rig count was up by 5 to 47 directional rigs this week, and those were also up by 11  from the 36 directional rigs that were in use on March 18th of 2022…

The details on this week’s changes in drilling activity by state and by major shale basin are shown in our screenshot below of that part of the rig count summary pdf from Baker Hughes that gives us those changes…the first table below shows weekly and year over year rig count changes for the major oil & gas producing states, and the table below that shows the weekly and year over year rig count changes for the major US geological oil and gas basins…in both tables, the first column shows the active rig count as of March 17th, the second column shows the change in the number of working rigs between last week’s count (March 10th) and this week’s (March 17th) count, the third column shows last week’s March 10th active rig count, the 4th column shows the change between the number of rigs running on Friday and the number running on the Friday before the same weekend of a year ago, and the 5th column shows the number of rigs that were drilling at the end of that reporting week a year ago, which in this week’s case was the 11th of March, 2022...

even with a nine rig increase in natural gas drilling this week, the Utica shale count was down by four gas rigs to eleven; three of those gas rigs were pulled out of Ohio, while the lone Utica rig that had been drilling in Pennsylvania was also shut down.... but Pennsylvania saw an increase of three rigs drilling in the Marcellus, while two more Marcellus rigs were added in West Virginia, and hence the Marcellus rig count was up by five...four more natural gas rigs were added in the Eagle Ford shale​ of southeast Texas​, while 6 oil rigs were pulled out of the Eagle Ford at the same time, leaving the Eagle Ford rig count down by two, with 62 oil rigs and 8 targeting natural gas deployed in the basin...another natural gas rig was added in the Permian basin, which also saw 6 oil rigs added at the same time, leaving the Permian with 345 oil rigs and 5 targeting natural gas...in addition, three natural gas rigs were added in the Haynesville shale in Texas, but the Haynesville shale count remained unchanged because three natural gas rigs were pulled out of the Haynesville in Louisiana at the same time... finally, three more natural gas rigs were added in "other" basins​ that are not tracked by Baker Hughes...it's not evident from the summary tables where those might have been added, and the only way to find out for sure would be to tediously scan through the individual well records found in the North America Rotary Rig Count Pivot Table...

meanwhile, checking the Rigs by State file at Baker Hughes for the changes in the Texas Permian, we find that there was one rig added in Texas Oil District 8A, which overlies the northern part of the Permian Midland, and that 2 rigs were added in Texas Oil District 7C, which includes two counties in the easternmost Permian Midland...since the Texas Permian rig count was thus up by 3 rigs while the national Permian count was up by 7, we can figure that the 3 rigs added in New Mexico were set up to drill in the western Permian Delaware, in the southeast corner of that state....in addition, since another rig must have been added somewhere else in the Permian, it must have been offset by a concurrent removal of a rig in the same area, such that it wouldn't show in the totals....

in the Eagle Ford region of Texas, the rig count was down by seven in Texas Oil District 1, but up by eight in Texas Oil District 2, and up by two in Texas Oil District 3, but down by three in Texas Oil District 4...since the Eagle Ford count was down by two, two of the noted rig additions weren't targeting the Eagle Ford, but another basin that Baker Hughes doesn't track; among the other Eagle Ford​ ​additions, at least 4 were targeting natural gas, while among the Eagle Ford removals, six had been targeting oil; the remainder would be combinations of offsetting changes of similar rigs that would add up to zero​, and hence not appear in the summary data​...

elsewhere in Texas, there was a rig pulled out of Texas Oil District 5. which had apparently been targeting a basin not tracked by Baker Hughes, while were there three natural rigs added in the Haynesville shale in Texas Oil District 6, which we only know because there were three rigs removed from the Haynesville shale region of Louisiana at the same time, while the​ national​ Haynesville count remained unchanged; the Louisiana rig count ​ended up down by two with the addition of two rigs in the state's Gulf waters, and the concurrent removal of the only land based rig which had been drilling in the southern part of the state..

in other parts of the country, the rig added in Oklahoma was targeting a basin not tracked by Baker Hughes, while the rig added in Colorado was set up to drill for oil in the Niobrara chalk of the Rockies front range...meanwhile, the Alaska rig count remained unchanged despite the addition of the aforementioned rig offshore from the Kenai Peninsula because ​a directional rig that had been added ​in Alaska l​ast week to target oil at depth of between 10,000 and 15,000 feet with its location in Alaska ​blank is no longer shown this week, almost calling into question ​that odd​ addition..

++

++

++

Note:  there’s more here..

Sunday, March 12, 2023

record change in EIA crude oil balance sheet error renders US oil data comparisons nonsense; oil rigs at a 6 month low

EIA reports 1st oil supply draw in 11 weeks after a record supply to demand change in their crude oil balance sheet error; oil drilling rig activity is at a 6 month low..

US oil prices fell for the third time in four weeks ​as traders repriced the likelihood of a demand crushing recession following hawkish comments from Fed Chairman Powell....after rising 4.4% to $79.68 a barrel last week on stronger than expected economic data from China, record US crude oil exports, and a falling US dollar, the contract price for the benchmark US light sweet crude for April delivery moved lower in early Asian trading on Monday after China set a lower-than-expected​ 5% target for economic growth, then steadied as top oil executives debated supply tightness at an oil conference in Houston, and​ subsequently​ bounced back from early losses by mid-day to settle 78 cents, or 1% higher, at $80.46 a barrel, supported by a Saudi price hike for its flagship Arab light crude to Asia, as well as ​by ​a weaker dollar...oil prices were steady in Dubai trading early on Tuesday​,​ as optimism over China’s economic recovery offset concerns of further monetary tightening, but turned lower on weak trade data from China and then tumbled after the Energy Information Administration lowered its 2023 forecasts for U.S. natural-gas and oil prices before settling $2.88 or 3.6% lower at to $77.58 a barrel, further pressured by a selloff in financial markets after Fed Chairman Powell opened the door for a 50-basis point rate hike at the Fed's next policy meeting, spooking traders across financial and commodity markets....oil prices extended those losses overnight as markets came to grips with the prospect that the Fed would continue aggressive rate increases​ and thus hamper US demand. but rebounded early Wednesday after EIA data showed an unexpected draw from US crude oil inventories for the first time in eleven weeks, but then fell ​​back again a second day to settle 92 cents lower at $76.66 a barrel as the supportive U.S. inventory data was canceled out by Fed Chair Powell’s testimony to Congress, which continued to spook traders worried about the intensity of oncoming rate hikes...oil prices rose in overseas trading on Thursday, as a strike​-​disrupted fuel supply in France, a drop in U.S. crude inventories​,​ and a weaker dollar ​temporarily ​offset fears over the economic impact of rising interest rates, ​​but ​again ​turned south in US trading to extend losses for third straight session and close 94 cents lower at $75.72 a barrel as traders braced for​ ​an employment report that was seen likely to impact the decision on interest rates...oil prices extended those losses into early morning Friday, pressured by weak fuel demand and the hawkish comments from Fed Chairman Powell, but rallied after the BLS reported much better-than-expected U.S. employment data and settled up 96 cents, or 1.3% higher, at $76.68 a barrel, but ​nonetheless ended 3.8% lower on the week, amid fears that the Fed would pivot to more aggressive interest-rate hikes, compounding pressure from tempered economic projections from China and a slower-than-expected recovery in international travel...

Meanwhile, natural gas prices fell for the first time in 3 weeks on​ lowered demand expectations following​ moderating temperature forecasts...after rising 18.1% to a five week high of $3.009 per mmBTU last week as the amount of gas flowing to U.S. LNG export plants soared to a record high amid colder two-week forecasts, the contract price of US natural gas for April delivery opened at $2.630 per mmBTU on Monday, thirty-eight cents below Friday’s closing price, following a milder shift in the temperatures expected next week, and maintained its downward momentum to settle 43.7 cents or 14.5% lower at $2.572 per mmBTU, its biggest one-day drop in over eight months, as the weekend weather models had removed a huge amount of demand from the 15-day outlook...​but ​natural gas prices opened higher and staged a mild rally on Tuesday, on record gas flows to liquefied natural gas (LNG) export plants following Freeport LNG's ​return from its outage, and settled 11.5 cents or 4.5% higher at $2.687 per mmBTU​, ​as incoming frigid temperatures held off any additional selling.​.​.however, natural gas prices reversed and fell 13.6 cents, or about 5% on Wednesday to a one-week low of $2.551 per mmBTU, after data showed the amount of gas flowing to Freeport plant in Texas had dropped, and on forecasts indicating the weather in the near term would be warmer than had been expected...​even so, ​natural gas prices opened higher and rose to $2.639 by 10:00AM, ahead of the weekly storage report on Thursday, before pulling back and settling eight-tenths of a cent lower at $2.543 per mmBTU​,​ as ​the ​storage withdrawal was much smaller than usual for this time of year and as the latest weather forecasts called for less cold over the next two weeks...prices continued falling on Friday on declining March heating demand expectations coast-to-coast and settled 11.3 cents, or 4.4% lower at $2.430 per mmBTU, and thus finished 19.2% lower for the week...

The EIA's natural gas storage report for the week ending March 3rd indicated that the amount of working natural gas held in underground storage in the US fell by 84 billion cubic feet to 2,030 billion cubic feet by the end of the week, which left our natural gas supplies 493 billion cubic feet, or 32.1% above the 1,537 billion cubic feet that were in storage on March 3rd of last year, and 359 billion cubic feet, or 21.5% more than the five-year average of 1,671 billion cubic feet of natural gas that were in storage as of the 3rd of March over the most recent five years….the 84 billion cubic foot withdrawal from US natural gas working storage for the cited week was a little more than was expected by a Reuters survey of analysts, whose average forecast called for a 80 billion cubic feet withdrawal, but it was much less than the 126 billion cubic feet that were pulled out of natural gas storage during the corresponding week of 2022, and also less than the average 101 billion cubic feet of natural gas that have typically been withdrawn from our natural gas storage during the same winter week over the past 5 years…

The Latest US Oil Supply and Disposition Data from the EIA

US oil data from the US Energy Information Administration for the week ending March 3rd indicated that even after a ​near ​record drop in our oil exports, we needed to pull oil out of our stored commercial crude supplies for the first time in 11 weeks, and for the 17h time in the past 46 weeks, largely due to the absence of oil that could not be accounted for... Our imports of crude oil rose by an average of 63,000 barrels per day to average 6,271,000 barrels per day, after falling by an average of 118,000 barrels per day during the prior week, while our exports of crude oil fell by 2,267,000 barrels per day to 3,362,000 barrels per day, which combined meant that the net of our trade in oil worked out to a net import average of 2,909,000 barrels of oil per day during the week ending March 3rd, 2,330,000 more barrels per day than the net of our imports minus our exports during the prior week. Over the same period, production of crude from US wells was reportedly 100,000 barrels per day lower at 12,200,000 barrels per day, and hence our daily supply of oil from the net of our international trade in oil and from domestic well production appears to have averaged a total of 15,​109,000 barrels per day during the March 3rd reporting week…

Meanwhile, US oil refineries reported they were processing an average of 14,967,000 barrels of crude per day during the week ending March 3rd, an average of 12,000 fewer barrels per day than the amount of oil that our refineries processed during the prior week, while over the same period the EIA’s surveys indicated that an average of 242,000 barrels of oil per day were being pulled out of the supplies of oil stored in the US. So, based on that reported & estimated data, the crude oil figures provided by the EIA for the week ending March 3rd appear to indicate that our total working supply of oil from net imports, from oilfield production, and from storage was 384,000 barrels per day more than what our oil refineries reported they used during the week. To account for that disparity between the apparent supply of oil and the apparent disposition of it, the EIA just inserted a [-384,000] barrel per day figure onto line 13 of the weekly U.S. Petroleum Balance Sheet in order to make the reported data for the daily supply of oil and for the consumption of it balance out, a fudge factor that they label in their footnotes as “unaccounted for crude oil”, thus suggesting there was an omission or error of that size in this week’s oil supply & demand figures that we have just transcribed..... Furthermore, since last week’s “unaccounted for crude oil” was at [+2,266,000] barrels per day, that means there was a record 2,650,000 barrel per day difference between this week's balance sheet error and the EIA's crude oil balance sheet error from a week ago, and hence the changes to supply and demand from that week to this one that are indicated by this week's report are off by that much, thus rendering such comparisons nonsensical.... However, since most everyone treats these weekly EIA reports as precise, and since these weekly figures often drive oil pricing, and hence decisions to drill or complete oil wells, we’ll continue to report this data just as it's published, and just as it's watched & believed to be reasonably accurate by most everyone in the industry...(for more on how this weekly oil data is gathered, and the possible reasons for that “unaccounted for” oil, see this EIA explainer)….

Further details from the weekly Petroleum Status Report (pdf) indicate that the 4 week average of our oil imports fell to an average of 6,259,000 barrels per day last week, which was still 1.4% more than the 6,176,000 barrel per day average that we were importing over the same four-week period last year. This week's 242,000 barrel per day decrease in our overall crude oil inventories was all withdrawn from our commercially available stocks of crude oil, while the amount of oil in our Strategic Petroleum Reserve remained unchanged.. This week’s crude oil production was reported to be 100,000 barrels per day lower at 12,200,000 barrels per day because the EIA's rounded estimate of the output from wells in the lower 48 states was 100,000 barrels per day lower at 11,800,000 barrels per day, while Alaska’s oil production was 5,000 barrels per day lower at 440,000 barrels per day and added 400,000 barrels per day to the the rounded national total, same as last week....US crude oil production had reached a pre-pandemic high of 13,100,000 barrels per day during the week ending March 13th 2020, so this week’s reported oil production figure was still 6.9% below that of our pre-pandemic production peak, but was 25.8% above the pandemic low of 9,700,000 barrels per day that US oil production had fallen to during the third week of February of 2021.

US oil refineries were operating at 86.0% of their capacity while using those 14,967,000 barrels of crude per day during the week ending March 3rd, up from their 85.8% utilization rate during the prior week, and close to normal utilization for early March, when seasonal maintenance is ​still ​slowing throughput.. The 14,967,000 barrels per day of oil that were refined this week were 2.7% less than the 15,377,000 barrels of crude that were being processed daily during week ending March 4th of 2022, and 6.4% less than the 15,990,000 barrels that were being refined during the prepandemic week ending March 1st, 2019, when our refinery utilization was 87.5%, also close to normal utilization for early March ...

With another modest decrease in the amount of oil being refined this week, the gasoline output from our refineries finally​ turned​ lower, decreasing by 179,000 barrels per day to 9,557,000 barrels per day during the week ending March 3rd, after our gasoline output had increased by 302,000 barrels per day during the prior week. This week’s gasoline production was fractionally less than the 9,577,000 barrels of gasoline that were being produced daily over the same week of last year, and 3.0% less than the gasoline production of 9,652,000 barrels per day during the prepandemic week ending March 1st, 2019. Meanwhile, our refineries’ production of distillate fuels (diesel fuel and heat oil) decreased by 84,000 barrels per day to 4,525,000 barrels per day, after our distillates output had decreased by 91,000 barrels per day during the prior week. With those decrease​s​, our distillates output was 2.8% less than the 4,640,000 barrels of distillates that were being produced daily during the week ending March 4th of 2022, and 8.0% less than the 4,919,000 barrels of distillates that were being produced daily during the week ending March 1st, 2019...

With the decrease in our gasoline production, our supplies of gasoline in storage at the end of the week fell for the fifth time in seventeen weeks and for the 15th time in 30 weeks, decreasing by 1,134,000 barrels to 238,058,000 barrels during the week ending March 3rd,​ ​after our gasoline inventories had decreased by 874,000 barrels during the prior week. Our gasoline supplies fell by more this week even though the amount of gasoline supplied to US users fell by 550,000 barrels per day to 8,562,000 barrels per day, because our imports of gasoline fell by 226,000 barrels per day to 446,000 barrels per day, and because our exports of gasoline rose by 180,000 barrels per day to 831,000 barrels per day.. Following three straight gasoline inventory ​decreases, our gasoline supplies were 2.7% below last March 4th's gasoline inventories of 244,606,000 barrels, and about 3% below the five year average of our gasoline supplies for this time of the year…

Even with the decrease in our distillates production, our supplies of distillate fuels increased for the 5th time in 10 weeks, and for the 29th time over the past year, rising by 138,000 barrels to 122,252,000 barrels during the week ending February 24th, after our distillates supplies had increased by 179,000 barrels during the prior week. Our distillates supplies managed to increase again this week because the amount of distillates supplied to US markets, an indicator of our domestic demand, decreased by 321,000 barrels per day to 3,514,000 barrels per day, even as our imports of distillates fell by 56,000 barrels per day to 141,000 barrels per day, and as our exports of distillates rose by 187,000 barrels per day to 1,132,000 barrels per day... Even after fifty-seven inventory withdrawals over the past ninety-six weeks, our distillate supplies at the end of the week were were 7.4% above the 113,874,000 barrels of distillates that we had in storage on March 4th of 2022, but still about 7% below the five year average of our distillates inventories for this time of the year...

Finally, with ​copius new oil supplies that could not be accounted for not an issue this week, our commercial supplies of crude oil in storage fell for the 13th time in 30 weeks and for the 27th time in the past year, decreasing by 1,694,000 barrels over the week, from 480,207,000 barrels on February 24th to 478,513,000 barrels on March 3rd, after our commercial crude supplies had increased by 1,166,000 barrels over the prior week. With several large oil supply increases in the weeks following the Christmas refinery freeze offs, our commercial crude oil inventories were still about 7% above the most recent five-year average of commercial oil supplies for this time of year, and also about 45% above the average of our available crude oil stocks as of the first weekend of March over the 5 years at the beginning of the past decade, with the apparent disparity between those comparisons arising because it wasn’t until early 2015 that our oil inventories first topped 400 million barrels. And even after our commercial crude oil inventories had jumped to record highs during the Covid lockdowns of the Spring of 2020, and then jumped again after February 2021's winter storm Uri froze off US Gulf Coast refining, our commercial crude supplies as of this March 3rd were 16.2% more than the 413,425,000 barrels of oil we had in commercial storage on March 4th of 2022, but 4.0% less than the 498,403,000 barrels of oil that we had in storage after winter storm Uri on March 5th of 2021, while 5.9% more than the 444,119,000 barrels of oil we had in commercial storage on March 6th of 2020…

This Week's Rig Count

The number of drilling rigs active in the US decreased for the 17th time over the prior 31 weeks during the week ending March 10th, and were 5.9% below the prepandemic ​count, even after increasing ninety-five times over the past 127 weeks... Baker Hughes reported that the total count of rotary rigs drilling in the US fell by three to 746 rigs over the past week, which was still 83 more rigs than the 663 rigs that were in use as of the March 11th report of 2022, but was 1,183 fewer rigs than the shale era high of 1,929 drilling rigs that were deployed on November 21st of 2014, a week before OPEC began to flood the global market with oil in an attempt to put US shale out of business. .

The number of rigs drilling for oil decreased by 2 to to a 26 week low of 590 oil rigs during the past week, after the number of rigs targeting oil had decreased by 8 during the prior week, ​but there are still 63 more oil rigs active now than were running a year ago, even as they amount to just 36.7% of the shale era high of 1609 rigs that were drilling for oil on October 10th, 2014, and while they are now down 13.6% from the prepandemic oil rig count….at the same time, the number of drilling rigs targeting natural gas bearing formations decreased by 1 to 153 natural gas rigs, which was still up by 18 natural gas rigs from the 135 natural gas rigs that were drilling during the same week a year ago, even as they were only 9.6% of the modern high of 1,606 rigs targeting natural gas that were deployed on September 7th, 2008….

In addition to those rigs targeting oil and natural gas, Baker Hughes indicates that three rigs they've labeled as "miscellaneous" are ​still ​drilling this week: those include a directional rig drilling to between 5,000 and 10,000 feet on the big island of Hawaii, a directional rig drilling to between 5,000 and 10,000 feet into a formation in Lake county California that Baker Hughes doesn't track, and a directional rig drilling to between 5,000 and 10,000 feet into a formation in Pershing county Nevada​, also unnamed by Baker Hughes​….While we haven't seen any details on any of those wells, in the past we've identified various "miscellaneous" rig activity as being for exploration, for carbon dioxide storage, and for utility scale geothermal projects....a year ago, there were two such "miscellaneous" rigs running...

The offshore rig count in the Gulf of Mexico was down by two to 14 rigs this week, with 13 of those remaining drilling for oil in Louisiana's offshore waters and one drilling for oil in Texas waters….that Gulf rig count is still up by 3 from the 11 Gulf rigs running a year ago, when 10 Gulf rigs were drilling for oil offshore from Louisiana and one was deployed for oil offshore from Texas….since there aren't any rigs drilling off our other coasts at this time, the Gulf rig count is equal to the national offshore count..

In addition to rigs running offshore, there is also a water based directional rig drilling for oil at a depth greater than 15,000 feet through an inland body of water in Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana this week...a year ago, there were three rigs drilling on inland waters...

The count of active horizontal drilling rigs was up by 2 to 692 horizontal rigs this week, which was also 85 more rigs than the 607 horizontal rigs that were in use in the US on March 11th of last year, but was just over half of the record 1,374 horizontal rigs that were drilling on November 21st of 2014.....on the other hand, the vertical rig count was down by two to 12 vertical rigs this week, which was also down by 11 from the 23 vertical rigs that were operating during the same week a year ago… at the same time, the directional rig count was down by three to 42 directional rigs this week, while those were still up by 9 from the 33 directional rigs that were in use on March 11th of 2022…

The details on this week’s changes in drilling activity by state and by major shale basin are shown in our screenshot below of that part of the rig count summary pdf from Baker Hughes that gives us those changes…the first table below shows weekly and year over year rig count changes for the major oil & gas producing states, and the table below that shows the weekly and year over year rig count changes for the major US geological oil and gas basins…in both tables, the first column shows the active rig count as of March 10th, the second column shows the change in the number of working rigs between last week’s count (March 3rd) and this week’s (March 10th) count, the third column shows last week’s March 3rd active rig count, the 4th column shows the change between the number of rigs running on Friday and the number running on the Friday before the same weekend of a year ago, and the 5th column shows the number of rigs that were drilling at the end of that reporting week a year ago, which in this week’s case was the 11th of March, 2022...

with that big rig drop in the Permian basin​ count​, we'll start by checking the Rigs by State file at Baker Hughes for the changes in the Texas Permian...there we find that there were five rigs pulled out of Texas Oil District 8, which overlies the core Permian Delaware, and that another rig was pulled out of Texas Oil District 8A, which overlies the northern part of the Permian Midland​, but that 3 rigs were added in Texas Oil District 7C, which covers the southern Permian Midland...since the Texas Permian rig count ​was thus down by 3 rigs while the national Permian count was down by 6, we can figure that the 3 rigs pulled out of New Mexico had been drilling in the western Permian Delaware, in the southeast corner of that state....elsewhere in Texas, the rig count was down by one in Texas Oil District 3, apparently pulled from a basin that's not tracked by Baker Hughes, but up by one in Texas Oil District 4, which would account for the addition of a natural gas rig in the Eagle Ford shale, where the basin split is now 4 rigs targeting gas and 68 targeting oil... the Texas rig count remained unchanged, however, with the addition of three rigs in Texas Oil District 6, which included a natural gas rig in the Haynesville shale and two rigs targeting a basin that's not tracked by Baker Hughes...

that Haynesville shale gas rig addition in Texas offset the removal of a Haynesville shale natural gas rig from Louisiana, ​leaving the Haynesville unchanged, ​while the other two rigs removed from Louisiana had been drilling​ in state waters​ offshore...other natural gas rig changes include the three rigs that were pulled out of the Marcellus in Pennsylvania, and the two natural gas rigs added to the Marcellus in West Virginia...meanwhile, the oil rig added to the DJ Niobrara chalk was in Colorado, while the rig added to the Mississippian shale was in Oklahoma, which means that another rig​ had to have been removed from elsewhere in Oklahoma for the state count to remain unchanged....lastly, the three rigs added in Alaska were all directional rigs targeting oil at depths between 10,000 and 15,000 feet; one was targeting the Sagavanirktok formation east of the Colville River, another was drilling over the Umiat Oil Field, and the location and target of the third is not indicated...all the legacy rigs drilling in Alaska are on the North Slope, with no other specific information given...

++

++

++

Note:  there’s more here..